- Joined
- Apr 19, 2020
- Messages
- 149
- Points
- 143
устроили тут...
-
Win a Free Custom Engraved Brass Coin!!!
As a way to introduce our brass coins to the community, we will raffle off a free coin during the month of August. Follow link ABOVE for instructions for entering.
Сестрорецк [Sestroretsk] Scratchbuild scale 1/64 Russ. torpedo boat 1894
Hello friends, I didn't expect such monster waves in this discussion - thanks for your intensety. As I am at the very beginning of learning modern Russian language I will take the advice telling me, it is grammatically correct - just because due to this it is a letter too much if wrong, but not a missing letter if it is right. That's my simple logic behind this, because I can not tell who of you both is right - both arguments sound logical to me so I do choose "the path with less possible error".
I also do have to redo the one letter the uppest "flag" is going into the wrong direction:
The top dash hast to show towards the left not the right - making it even broder in size.
So I will work in this to get it right and then I do have to undo the Cyrillic side of my stand to press two dot five additional letters into the very same space
We will see.
I also do have to redo the one letter the uppest "flag" is going into the wrong direction:
The top dash hast to show towards the left not the right - making it even broder in size.
So I will work in this to get it right and then I do have to undo the Cyrillic side of my stand to press two dot five additional letters into the very same space
We will see.
This isn't modern language. These are old spelling rules that existed before the 1918 reform. 99.9% of modern Russians don't know them, as our discussion demonstrates. Regarding the spelling of the word "Sestroretsk"—without going into grammatical subtleties—I showed a scan from an encyclopedic dictionary of that era, where it is written according to the rules of the time. This eliminates any doubt. In the examples my opponent showed, the letter "Ѣ" is missing precisely because it's not needed there according to grammatical rules, and in no other way. Assumptions that the word was spelled one way in the dictionary and differently on board the ship are complete nonsense.
As for the new letter (am I right in thinking it's Ъ?), to keep the style, I would do it something like this:
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2020
- Messages
- 149
- Points
- 143
Есть же фото реального корабля с названием, чего изобретать?
There is a photo of a real ship with a name, why invent it?
As for spelling, you can easily use the German Wikipedia on the topic of pre-reform spelling.
de.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
There is a photo of a real ship with a name, why invent it?
As for spelling, you can easily use the German Wikipedia on the topic of pre-reform spelling.
Ѣ – Wikipedia
Reforms of Russian orthography - Wikipedia
Last edited:
Quod erat probandum.
I think the Herold Cyrillic font would work well. You'll just have to create the letter Ѣ.
I think the Herold Cyrillic font would work well. You'll just have to create the letter Ѣ.
Last edited:
Due to the helpfull hand of a German colleauge I now do know the letters for the name onto both sides the ship's stern:
That's not the case. A photo of the real ship is posted here.
...slow, but steady progress.
The outline of the bulkheads is inbetween hardened by cheap superglue.
Nothing is bond into space, as the CWL must be added, too.
The outline of the bulkheads is inbetween hardened by cheap superglue.
Nothing is bond into space, as the CWL must be added, too.
Hello friends,
today I was able to take pictures of my way to cut out the bookbinder's cardboard into a bulkhead.
One bulkheads needed arround 90 minutes.
And so it does start to come togeather- step by step...
today I was able to take pictures of my way to cut out the bookbinder's cardboard into a bulkhead.
One bulkheads needed arround 90 minutes.
And so it does start to come togeather- step by step...
My next step besides the bulkheads are the waterlines N°3 and CWL .
The CWL(in the picture below it is the lower horizontal Line)will be cut into between bulkheads length rectangular filling pices along the drawing hull's outline - the same with WL N°3 (here the upperline in the picture).
By this I do form the very first part of the outline of the hull. Other pices will be added between them and the more slides are added the more exact the outline will be.
Here you can see the deck's bent line with this very sharp edge downwards the hullside:
I am still figuring out how to establish this characteristic feature into the hull. Thinking about bend sheeds of cardboard going from edge to Edge - beaveled on top?
Or to individually lay an inner parallel to the outlines for 1mm thick cardboard, and use Ab Hoving's light soft cardboard for this perpuse but BETWEEN the bulkheads!
This due to the bulkheads not were dinimished to add a layer of cardboard on it - i am in need of cladding 0,5mms plastic sheets ontop to laminate the layer of Steel/Aluminium plating. These we're hold in place by 25-30mm rivets - so some 0,5mm in scale. Showing these or avoiding these?
The CWL(in the picture below it is the lower horizontal Line)will be cut into between bulkheads length rectangular filling pices along the drawing hull's outline - the same with WL N°3 (here the upperline in the picture).
By this I do form the very first part of the outline of the hull. Other pices will be added between them and the more slides are added the more exact the outline will be.
Here you can see the deck's bent line with this very sharp edge downwards the hullside:
I am still figuring out how to establish this characteristic feature into the hull. Thinking about bend sheeds of cardboard going from edge to Edge - beaveled on top?
Or to individually lay an inner parallel to the outlines for 1mm thick cardboard, and use Ab Hoving's light soft cardboard for this perpuse but BETWEEN the bulkheads!
This due to the bulkheads not were dinimished to add a layer of cardboard on it - i am in need of cladding 0,5mms plastic sheets ontop to laminate the layer of Steel/Aluminium plating. These we're hold in place by 25-30mm rivets - so some 0,5mm in scale. Showing these or avoiding these?
Last edited:
I leafed through my pictures and didn't find any rivet visable:
...but the rows of plates are quite visable:
...and some insides of hatches, lamps, WCs and some round Version of the screw protection:
But I found the quare modeled screws protection of the French Tb DART in quite useable detail:
...but the
...but the rows of plates are quite visable:
...and some insides of hatches, lamps, WCs and some round Version of the screw protection:
But I found the quare modeled screws protection of the French Tb DART in quite useable detail:
...but the
Last edited: