- Joined
- Mar 1, 2022
- Messages
- 729
- Points
- 308

So many inspiring ideas!
![]() |
As a way to introduce our brass coins to the community, we will raffle off a free coin during the month of August. Follow link ABOVE for instructions for entering. |
![]() |
![]() |
The beloved Ships in Scale Magazine is back and charting a new course for 2026! Discover new skills, new techniques, and new inspirations in every issue. NOTE THAT OUR NEXT ISSUE WILL BE MARCH/APRIL 2026 |
![]() |


First off, I'm very glad your head didn't explode ! Someone would have to clean up that mess !What I'm doing now isn't very presentable, and there's not much to see, but in fact, this is one of the most important things—the calculations—so that everything will be correct in the future. I'm finishing up the nail calculations on the deck. And today I'll make a small platform (a small deck in the stern). Ironically, it wasn't shown in the original drawings, and Goodwin interpreted it exactly that way, although it's not certain that it even existed. But I've already started using these drawings, and there's no turning back. And I started with the step between the main and small decks.
View attachment 586128
View attachment 586129
View attachment 586130
This step covers the main deck boards and now I can see where the nail line will be.
View attachment 586131
View attachment 586132
View attachment 586133
At the end of one board in each joint I made a chamfer, where I poured glue and made an imitation of a caulking seam.
View attachment 586134
View attachment 586135
View attachment 586136
View attachment 586137
Now here's a platform with nail placement calculations. There's a window sill line on the sides, so this detail will cover some of the boards, and this needs to be taken into account in the calculations. Regarding the middle four beams, although they are specified with two nails per beam, I disagree. The boards are significantly thinner here, and the beams are also very thin, plus the distances between the beams are small, so one nail per beam (above and below the middle of the board) is more than enough. Incidentally, all the details aren't finished yet; this is just a preliminary fitting.
P.S. I spent a lot of time examining the stern structure, studying all the elements (so many hours that my brain almost exploded), and unfortunately, due to so many inaccuracies and contradictions in the anatomy, I have to invent everything as I go, spending a colossal amount of time and effort on it... I understand that few people are interested in this whole specific topic of inaccuracies and corrections, and especially the reasoning behind my options, so I will simply show how I do it, and if anyone is interested in why exactly this way, write in the comments, I will be happy to answer.
I always find your explanations interesting and educational as well. I'm still learning. So many inspiring ideas!
Please show as much as possible ... it's all about learning![]()
Thank you very much, friends. I will continue to try to show and tell you about everything I do.First off, I'm very glad your head didn't explode ! Someone would have to clean up that mess !I always find your explanations interesting and educational as well. I'm still learning.
Your work is looking great and your calculations are paying off with huge dividends !







