LE COUREUR - french Lugger 1776 - POF kit from CAF in 1:48 by Uwe

Yesterday I had one hour free time, so I was able to start with the other side of the inner planking
I make it the same way and order like the first side - starting with the plank close to the keelson

IMG-4945.jpg

IMG-4946.jpg
 
The last group it was one day, but this is much too long - because of shrinkage because of drying I have now partly some small gaps between the planks - so I guess one or only some hours only would be better
Ach Ja -> and the strips are not getting softer with much more hours in water o_O
 
Something different from the daily planking....

Yesterday I was taking a first look at the next possible working steps - maybe the outside planking or going further with the inside structure?

Let us take a first view on the bulkheads

This is the manual description
IMG-4952.jpg

The parts on wooden sheet C1 are only templates in order to get the correct outer shape, so that the final bulkhead will fit smoothly into the hull
IMG-4948.jpg

IMG-4949.jpg

IMG-4950.jpg

Good to know, how this will work

Step by step I am coming to the situation, that I have to decide, which areas will be covered (internal planking, external planking and deck planking) or uncovered, in order to see the interior structure.
The advantage of the bigger spacing between the frames will produce a good side view inside, so I think I will not completely plank the outside later on, maybe one half of the hull, or main parts of one side will be unplanked ..... let us see. So maybe I start with the interior first to get a good impression before I make the hull planking.....
 
Last edited:
How long did you soak the planks for Uwe?
Yesterday I installed the last planks of sheet 1P and now I can really show the difference in the result.
So with this photos I want to warn and advise everybody not to soak the planks too long in water

IMG-4954.jpg

IMG-4955.jpg

The red marked area I left the planks between 0,5 and 1 hour in water - enough, that they were soft enough to adjust the form, and there is a very limited shrinkage visible
the green marked areas are the planks, which were over night or up to 1 day in water - soft for handling, but after installation and drying, the shrinkage is visible with partly gaps between the planks.
Off course the total gap between two planks is the shrinkage of both planks
The not nice gaps are marked with the blue arrows
=> I learnt something, so please learn by my error and do not make the same error
=> These gaps are not very problematic, if you fill the hold with some stone ballast and barrels etc. but if you can avoid it.....

Here are photos from CAF with "covered" planking - somehow before and after
14 (1).jpg

25.jpg

37.jpg
 
Hallo friends,
in post #189
I mentioned, that I made in the beginning the part 08-2 in a wrong way

on the left side you can see the "wrong" part filed out of the kit part - on the right the corrected one build scratch

IMG-4972.jpg

the bottom side which will law on top of the keelson
IMG-4973.jpg

IMG-4982.jpg

IMG-4983.jpg

Here sitting on top of the keelson
IMG-4975.jpg

with the help of the cnc-formed beam 5A-2 and the template 3C-1 the correct location of the mast foot will be defined
IMG-4987.jpg

It is important, that you use this template to define the exact location of the mast-foot, due to the fact, that the structure of the beams, mast and mast-partners is effecting the location and not other parts like frames etc.
=> the clamp is defining the location of beam and with this the mast - the beam is defining the template 3C-1 - and the template is defining the mast-foot
IMG-4988.jpg
 
Here I want to refer to my post #212
in which I mentioned the possible ending of the inner planking at midship
My "solutions are wrong, which I know in the meantime, latest tomorrow I will show you why I came to this conclusion.
Nevertheless I want to give you the hint already now, where the planks should end.
According my actual knowledge the planking should completely overlap and cover the frames 12 and 25 !!!

IMG-4944aa.jpg
 
Last edited:
Here I want to refer to my post #212
in which I mentioned the possible ending of the inner planking at midship
My "solutions are wrong, which I know in the meantime, latest tomorrow I will show you why I came to this conclusion.
Nevertheless I want to give you the hint already now, where the planks should end.
According my actual knowledge the planking should completely overlap and cover the frames 17 and 25 !!!

View attachment 194704
Looking great, Uwe. So, notches in the deck clamps are laser cut, right? Do you have to square them, so that beams sit perpendicular to the keel?
 
Looking great, Uwe. So, notches in the deck clamps are laser cut, right? Do you have to square them, so that beams sit perpendicular to the keel?
the beam notches in the clamps are caused by the laser cut in 90° rectangular to the clamp, means, that at midhsip they are well rectangular to the keel - going aft or fore you will have to adjust them slightly
 
The first element of the interior is the ballast box which I prepared

This "Platform over the Ballast" was shown in the contemporary drawings "in green ink" available at the NMM

j0873.jpg
Scale: 1:48. A plan showing the body plan with stern board and decoration and name on stern counter, sheer lines with inboard detail modifications proposed in green ink, longitudinal half-breadth, and midship section showing the clinker framing, for 'Coureur' (1778), a captured French lugger, as modified to an 8-gun Schooner. Signed by John Henslow [Master Shipwright, Plymouth Dockyard, 1775-1784; later Surveyor of the Navy, 1784-1806].

j0874.jpg
Scale: 1:48. A plan showing the upper deck, and fore and aft platforms, with proposed modifications in green, for 'Coureur' (1778), a captured French lugger, as modified to an 8-gun Schooner. Signed by John Henslow [Master Shipwright, Plymouth Dockyard, 1775-1784; later Surveyor of the Navy, 1784-1806].

and here some excerpts showing the "box"

j0873.jpg

j0874a.jpg

from Wikipedia:
  • HMS Coureur (1778) was a French lugger that Jacques and Daniel Denys built at Dunkirk and launched on 8 May 1776.[1] Alert, under the command of Lieutenant William George Fairfax, engaged and captured her on 17 June 1778, in advance of the declaration of war. In the engagement Coureur, under the command of Enseigne de Rosily, had five men killed and seven wounded out of her crew of 50. Alert had four men wounded, two mortally.[2] The British took Coureur into the Royal Navy under her existing name. She was under the command of Lieutenant Christopher Major on 21 June 1780 when two American privateers, the Fortune and the Griffin, captured her outside Bonavista Bay after an action that cost her three men killed and four wounded.[3] The Americans put Major and 30 of his men aboard Griffin, which fell prey the next day to Fairy.[4]

This means for the purist:
If you want to build and show the HMS COUREUR (captured 1778) you should install the Platform over the Ballast
If you want to build the french version of the Le COUREUR (launched 1776) before the capture, than there was this platform not installed

Here you can see also the difference
HMS COUREUR like Tom build with the CAF test build
f7307f8f84.jpg
99169b2488.jpg

or the french version of Le Coureur shown in this 3D-animation without the "box or platform - here the stowage is laying directly on the inner planking, without the ballast stones
cf276b881a.jpg
4.jpg.434af5402537edf1031a4cf6b6aafaec.jpg
 
Last edited:
As always extremly informative, a real decision-making aid.
Hallo Adi,

As I mentioned - is is something for the purist and the final decision, will be also often subjective, how you want to present your model finally. In addition also a question of how much "material" like barrels, boxes etc. is available and will be shown. Because with the "box / platform" you will need less stowage.....
I think in moment, that I will finally install this platform and fill it with some stone ballast, but also will name my ship with her french name LE COUREUR.......
In addition my partly not nice inner planking with shrinking gaps between the planks will be covered and get not visible with the stone ballast

Now let us show the information given in the manual

IMG-4964.jpg

IMG-4965.jpg

and I found this animation on the web-page of CAF
89.jpg
 
Hallo Uwe, I also do not know yet exactely in which direction I should tend, But somehow the original Le Coureur appeals to me more. I like the the Lugger rigging very much. The English Coureur is a schooner, If I'm not mistaken.
 
Back
Top