- Joined
- Feb 18, 2019
- Messages
- 687
- Points
- 353
I am of course no authority on the matter... nor do I pretend to be an expert.
According to documentation (74-gun ship, vol.1) nails, in general, were proportioned as follows:
The length of the nails to be used is defined by a ratio indicating that it must penetrate the underlying timber by 5/9th of the length of its shank. Thus, if a 4-inch plank is nailed to the frame, the nail used should be 9 inches.
I cannot remember the exact ratio off the top of my head, but the dimension of the nail’s section (width of the shank) is also dictated by a ratio based on length. What I can say is that the head is approximately square. The head of the nail should be twice the width of the top of the shank. The shank of the nail is square although tapered following certain specifications: including the proportion of the actual tapered point.
Further info: the head of the nail must be countersunk (not protrude) into the lumber.
As far as planking nails are concerned, a twist of sealant material is applied under the head. The documentation indicates that the nail should be countersunk and that the countersink should take that into account.
Planking on Le Coureur
Given the information from the monograph and more specifically the representation of the hull as shown in plate 3, no treenails were used in this vessel. The text does not mention the use of treenails. I would remind the reader that usually (and that may be on larger ships or on carvel planked vessels), below the waterline, the planking was fastened by 1 nail and 1 treenail on each frame. Above the water line, where the planking is not clinker-style, upper-works, 2 nails.
G.
According to documentation (74-gun ship, vol.1) nails, in general, were proportioned as follows:
The length of the nails to be used is defined by a ratio indicating that it must penetrate the underlying timber by 5/9th of the length of its shank. Thus, if a 4-inch plank is nailed to the frame, the nail used should be 9 inches.
I cannot remember the exact ratio off the top of my head, but the dimension of the nail’s section (width of the shank) is also dictated by a ratio based on length. What I can say is that the head is approximately square. The head of the nail should be twice the width of the top of the shank. The shank of the nail is square although tapered following certain specifications: including the proportion of the actual tapered point.
Further info: the head of the nail must be countersunk (not protrude) into the lumber.
As far as planking nails are concerned, a twist of sealant material is applied under the head. The documentation indicates that the nail should be countersunk and that the countersink should take that into account.
Planking on Le Coureur
Given the information from the monograph and more specifically the representation of the hull as shown in plate 3, no treenails were used in this vessel. The text does not mention the use of treenails. I would remind the reader that usually (and that may be on larger ships or on carvel planked vessels), below the waterline, the planking was fastened by 1 nail and 1 treenail on each frame. Above the water line, where the planking is not clinker-style, upper-works, 2 nails.
G.
Last edited: