yeah, I saw those pieces in that very thin sheet.One little diversion…..one pump done.
Be advised, those side plates are fragile and you need to uniform the holes.
Tim
View attachment 562419
![]() |
As a way to introduce our brass coins to the community, we will raffle off a free coin during the month of August. Follow link ABOVE for instructions for entering. |
![]() |
yeah, I saw those pieces in that very thin sheet.One little diversion…..one pump done.
Be advised, those side plates are fragile and you need to uniform the holes.
Tim
View attachment 562419
Hi Jeff,most of the transom wings
You, of course, are correct. The transom wing will be the highest piece I install at this point. along with the lower transoms.Hi Jeff,
I know each ship had one wing transom, but I am not familiar with transom wings. I am guessing it may be nomenclature and you are referring to the transoms other than the wing transom such as the deck transom and lower transoms, but if there is something else, I would like to learn more. Thank you.
Allan
Sorry to go off track on your build but you gave me an idea. It can be like learning a foreign language for many of us, There are a lot of dictionary type lists as well as drawings with parts identified in many different books, but it would be great if someone did a simple booklet with perhaps 15 to 25 pages of clear drawings of no particular ship, but with the various parts identified in multiple languages. Do you or any other members following your build know of such a booklet?I'm still learning much of the nomenclature
One of the mystery's of this build. Appears kit shows one wing transom. my understanding, the flat piece that fits into timbers at junction between planking tops and transom structure.Hi Jeff,
I know each ship had one wing transom, but I am not familiar with transom wings. I am guessing it may be nomenclature and you are referring to the transoms other than the wing transom such as the deck transom and lower transoms, but if there is something else, I would like to learn more. Thank you.
Allan
No problem Allan, Sorry, I don't know of a book that small (15 to 25 pages). I have a couple of illustrated dictionaries (maybe I should use them more!Sorry to go off track on your build but you gave me an idea. It can be like learning a foreign language for many of us, There are a lot of dictionary type lists as well as drawings with parts identified in many different books, but it would be great if someone did a simple booklet with perhaps 15 to 25 pages of clear drawings of no particular ship, but with the various parts identified in multiple languages. Do you or any other members following your build know of such a booklet?
Please let me know your thoughts on this.
Thanks Jeff
Allan
The contemporary framing plan for Enterprise 1774 show she had five transoms, including the wing transom and deck transom. The vertical filler pieces below the lowest transom are not always shown on contemporary plans according to author David Antcherl, which is the case here.It appears the actual ship had two,

If you want to compare, here are what the kit instructions show for build.The contemporary framing plan for Enterprise 1774 show she had five transoms, including the wing transom and deck transom. The vertical filler pieces below the lowest transom are not always shown on contemporary plans according to author David Antcherl, which is the case here.
Allan
View attachment 562640

Bad terminology on my part…..miss I.D’d it. ApologiesThe contemporary framing plan for Enterprise 1774 show she had five transoms, including the wing transom and deck transom. The vertical filler pieces below the lowest transom are not always shown on contemporary plans according to author David Antcherl, which is the case here.
Allan
View attachment 562640
Glad to help Jeff, you owe me one nowtransom wing (thanks @AllanKP69).
Sounds like it might be the counter rail. Sketch or mark up the below? TxWhat is proper term for the molded trim piece that sits proud of transom about level with door bottom? This is reference calling for two.Been a long time since transom instillation….wing or otherwise.

Exactly. Also have been curious why so many examples show perfectly flat transom, yet your image from contract shows obvious curvature.Glad to help Jeff, you owe me one now
Cheers
Sounds like it might be the counter rail. Sketch or mark up the below? Tx
View attachment 562718
Sorry to ask but which image? The drawing in post #493 does not show any transoms.so many examples show perfectly flat transom


Understood, but it won't be planked over and the pieces will be large in relation to other smaller parts of the build. So I will endeavour to eliminate the solid bit of the stern.Solid blocks are not uncommon at such small scales and if the area is going to be planked over it makes a lot of sense. Then again, some of us are gluttons for punishment and attempt to make all the tiny (and sometimes annoying) pieces, if only for self satisfaction.
Allan
Images of various buildsSorry to ask but which image? The drawing in post #493 does not show any transoms.
There does seem to be a lot of variation on the lay of the transoms. Looking at contemporary models and plans, transoms were sometimes flat, sometimes rounded, sometimes pointed down slightly while others pointed slightly up. For HMS Enterprise 1774 the round up of the counter and wing transom was 7.5"
50 gun ship Litchfield 1695
View attachment 562746
HMS Elephant (74) 1786 with nine transoms
View attachment 562747
