You are absolute right, Heinrich. To build the model with input from several authors. For my BN the base of YQ with partly Jenson, Eisnor, Lankford and some AL-FI from Voogt. It must be more or less historically correct but it must also show (in scale) on the model. With the macro shot it now looks a bit messy, but if you look at the photo where the hull and the entire lower mast are on, you have to look very carefully at what it is exactly. For the shrouds, the Chapelle option is definitely going to look neater later on. So it will go that way. And I will make the macro’s with more decent dry-fit’s.I know I am late, but you shouldn't build so fast! As to which option to choose - I would always opt for the "cleaner" look like @Dean62 Dean suggested as well. However, seeing that you mention the two configurations and the author/s who subscribe to each, I think you should ask yourself the question on which have you based your build the most and follow that option. It irritates me to no end, that on some aspects of my WB build, I have to follow De Weerdt (because of the kit) while essentially building a Hoving model. Maybe, you can use that as a guideline.
Regards, Peter
Last edited: