POF L'Amarante Corvette de 12 canons 1744 1:36 (Ancre Monograph- Gérard Delacroix) By Shota

Tobias said:
Hello Shota, you are doing a great job and making progress. I can only agree with the guys. Three pictures of my spur, I don't even know if I have these pictures in the report. Here you can also see the overhang that Ricci @Giampy65 mentioned.

View attachment 470316

View attachment 470317

View attachment 470318
Click to expand...
my dearest friend Tobias
thank you very much for your kind words and support, the pictures are very helpful
How did the work progress on the purchase of a kit house in Croatia or Montenegro, I hope you fulfilled your dream Your photos when you can
 
shota70 said:
my dearest friend Tobias
thank you very much for your kind words and support, the pictures are very helpful
How did the work progress on the purchase of a kit house in Croatia or Montenegro, I hope you fulfilled your dream Your photos when you can
Click to expand...
Hello Shota my friend, we are still looking and are meeting up with a friend from the Split area in November to view more houses or properties. We have time and nothing can be rushed.
 
Tobias said:
Hello Shota my friend, we are still looking and are meeting up with a friend from the Split area in November to view more houses or properties. We have time and nothing can be rushed.
Click to expand...
Good luck my friend :)
You are acting wisely & correctly!
as the proverb says: recklessness is from the devil
 
hello my dear friends
I'm in the middle of working on the front of the bow.
During the work I identified differences that I would like to share with you and wish to receive guidance and assistance in formulating the work method.
As you saw in the previous updates, the two quarters of the crescent in which the floral decoration is located, are intact.
However, in advanced drawings, a change in the configuration of the crescent's quarters is identified, so that the lower one is cut in the upper/front part and so is the decoration between the quarters cut diagonally.
On the slope is placed a decoration of the French monarchy, as you will see in the drawings and pictures from the fine works of Giampy65 and Tobias.
The questions are:
Do I understand correctly that actually the shape of the three parts changes so that you get the symbol of the French royal house?
I also see that the members produced the parts whole and only towards the end of the process changed their configuration, so why not do it in the first place?
Cutting when the parts are glued can be complex and possibly dangerous for the model. Is there an explanation for this?
Also, since there are other parts that sit/connect to this part, what is the correct/desired order and method of work in preparing and fitting them to the bow
Thanks to everyone who knows and will help with explanations

amarante894.jpg

IMG-20240904-WA0015.jpeg

IMG-20240904-WA0013.jpeg

20240906_133904.jpg

20240906_145710.jpg

20240907_191142.jpg

20240914_141958.jpg

20240914_142442.jpg

20240914_142455.jpg

20240914_142513.jpg

Screenshot_20240914_142958_Chrome.jpg

amarante1517.jpg

amarante1552.jpg

Screenshot_20240914_143558_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20240914_143722_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20240914_143641_Chrome.jpg
 
Fabulous work!! I love that the drawings show the substantial tapering of the knee of the head from where it meets the stem to the forward end. This is often missed, but the Ancre drawings always seem to be among the very best due to the thorough research that goes into preparing them.
Allan
1726391580426.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Hello dear Shota, as you have already mentioned, you are absolutely right, the decoration in the spur is divided into three parts in the plans. I think the reason for this is the size in the original, I will make it from one piece. It is not very big and very delicate. You have to be careful because my decoration is different from that of L' Amarante.

IMG_1137.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Good evening dear friends
This evening I continued with the experiments and testing of the desired work method to create the floral decoration which is embedded between the two black quarters of the crescent, and which together form the front/front of the bow.
At this stage I used the laser burner, I drew two layers, the first of a full cut of the decoration frame and the outlines of the flowers. The second layer is the result of the other decorations that do not require deep/full burning, but rather a marking for continued fine carving later.
I made several samples, the first of a full thickness of 3 mm, which the burning method on one side is not sufficient. The second of two panels of 1.6 mm thickness. Sticking both gives the same burn on both sides, when lowering the tenth of a millimeter on each side removes soot. Unfortunately at this stage I used an increased burn poison which created soot beyond the required level. Tomorrow I will reduce the extent of the burns to reduce the amount of visible soot.
I think I would prefer the second method which is better, because it reduces the visibility of the soot as well.
The experiment is currently being carried out on a European pear , after achieving a desired result, it will be applied to boxwood.
I wonder what you think, good night everyone
20240916_200852.jpg20240916_200906.jpg20240916_200908.jpg20240916_201016.jpg20240916_203701.jpg20240916_204350.jpg20240916_204510.jpg20240916_211021.jpg20240916_212343.jpg20240916_223453.jpg
‏
 
Last edited:
shota70 said:
Good evening dear friends
This evening I continued with the experiments and testing of the desired work method to create the floral decoration which is embedded between the two black quarters of the crescent, and which together form the front/front of the bow.
At this stage I used the laser burner, I drew two layers, the first of a full cut of the decoration frame and the outlines of the flowers. The second layer is the result of the other decorations that do not require deep/full burning, but rather a marking for continued fine carving later.
I made several samples, the first of a full thickness of 3 mm, which the burning method on one side is not sufficient. The second of two panels of 1.6 mm thickness. Sticking both gives the same burn on both sides, when lowering the tenth of a millimeter on each side removes soot. Unfortunately at this stage I used an increased burn poison which created soot beyond the required level. Tomorrow I will reduce the extent of the burns to reduce the amount of visible soot.
I think I would prefer the second method which is better, because it reduces the visibility of the soot as well.
The experiment is currently being carried out on a European pear , after achieving a desired result, it will be applied to boxwood.
I wonder what you think, good night everyone
View attachment 471411View attachment 471412View attachment 471413View attachment 471414View attachment 471415View attachment 471416View attachment 471417View attachment 471418View attachment 471419View attachment 471420
‏
Click to expand...
I wondered how you could achieve a partial relief with a laser cutter. Great to know how it's done Shota!
 
Daniel20 said:
I wondered how you could achieve a partial relief with a laser cutter. Great to know how it's done Shota!
Click to expand...
Tobias said:
Hello dear Shota, as you have already mentioned, you are absolutely right, the decoration in the spur is divided into three parts in the plans. I think the reason for this is the size in the original, I will make it from one piece. It is not very big and very delicate. You have to be careful because my decoration is different from that of L' Amarante.

View attachment 471193
Click to expand...

Jimsky said:
I believe, Daniel, it is 3 pieces, where the middle has a different pattern. Let's see what Shota will say.
Click to expand...
my dear friends, thank you very much for your kind words and support :)

I don't sure that I understand correctly your question, please explain to me, and I will try to ensure
 
Mirek said:
Witaj
wygląda to fajnie Shoto trochę czyszczenia i będzie ok. Pozdrawiam Mirek
Click to expand...
Dziękuję bardzo, drogi przyjacielu Mirek, za słowa otuchy, ja też myślę, że trochę piaskowania i czyszczenia doprowadzi do pięknego efektu

Thank you very much, my dear friend Mirek, for the words of encouragement, I also think that a little sanding and cleaning will lead to a beautiful result
 
shota70 said:
I don't sure that I understand correctly your question, please explain to me
Click to expand...
Hi Shota, in my mind I did not understand how a laser could etch out a carving that does not go all the way through the wood. Your explanation of the laser just surface burning the wood and then you just remove the char for a completed relief view of the contours left behind was what made perfect sense.
 
Daniel20 said:
Hi Shota, in my mind I did not understand how a laser could etch out a carving that does not go all the way through the wood. Your explanation of the laser just surface burning the wood and then you just remove the char for a completed relief view of the contours left behind was what made perfect sense.
Click to expand...
Dear Daniel
Now we understand each other:D
I can determine the intensity of the burn, speed and amount of the burn.
The various experiments are designed to achieve the desired result, from drawing to engraving/deep cutting.
 
shota70 said:
Dear Daniel
Now we understand each other:D
I can determine the intensity of the burn, speed and amount of the burn.
The various experiments are designed to achieve the desired result, from drawing to engraving/deep cutting.
Click to expand...
I think you should take a look on Bill Short on MSW, he also sells here a PDF on how he does the carving. It's simpel and with a little practice you can make wonderful things and in combination with your laser tool! It can be even more.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top